On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 01:09 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > Why should clamav-unofficial-sigs be the clamd watchdog? If clamd is > actually being used, its caller can (and almost surely will) throw > errors. I run clamd on (some) servers as well, so I'm familiar with > those use cases too.
I'm not sure why Bill made it do that, perhaps he can tell us (CCed)? Bill, Richard is proposing that I change the configuration of clamav-unofficial-sigs in Debian so that it detects if clamav-daemon is running and only then issue reload commands. This will of course break the clamd watchdog feature of clamav-unofficial-sigs, any thoughts? http://bugs.debian.org/672537 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
