Am Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:31:30 +0100 schrieb Iain Buclaw <[email protected]>:
>
> I've had another thought for a while now that involves not
> constifying 'in' parameters, but at the same time not loosing its
> guarantee.
>
But we'd want this to work/inline nevertheless, right?:
------------
void test(const(char)[] a)
{
}
char[] abc;
test(abc);
------------
Then we still need to tell GCC that const(char)[] is a variant of
char[] or it won't inline.
