On 04/04/14 15:14, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:52:13 +0200 > schrieb Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com>: > >> Built latest gcc4-8-based gdc (fdf0c614) today; immediately ran into >> this: >> >> Which is much more reasonable, and shouldn't require such hacks. >> I thought that inlining /templated/ functions across modules already >> worked; is this a different problem, and, more importantly, is it >> fixable?
> Please try to reduce such examples in the future ;-) Sorry. Yes, I should have tried harder. [I'm probably subconsciously avoiding going near any phobos code... :)] > http://goo.gl/SJ0iEq > http://goo.gl/ykumCI > > @property bool empty(T)(in T[] a) @safe pure nothrow > > it's the 'in' which causes inlining to fail (const also fails). Hmm, I remember const-args were a problem in the past, but I had thought this was already fixed. A quick search reveals: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 (-ENOPERM) https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/300/array-empty-function-does-not-get-inlined (which says WONTFIX, but IIRC Iain fixed) artur
