On 04/04/14 15:42, Artur Skawina wrote: > On 04/04/14 15:14, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> Am Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:52:13 +0200 >> schrieb Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Built latest gcc4-8-based gdc (fdf0c614) today; immediately ran into >>> this: >>> >>> Which is much more reasonable, and shouldn't require such hacks. >>> I thought that inlining /templated/ functions across modules already >>> worked; is this a different problem, and, more importantly, is it >>> fixable?
>> @property bool empty(T)(in T[] a) @safe pure nothrow >> >> it's the 'in' which causes inlining to fail (const also fails). > > Hmm, I remember const-args were a problem in the past, but I had > thought this was already fixed. A quick search reveals: [...] Yep, I was remembering correctly: http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.33.1325763631.16222.d....@puremagic.com [no idea how I managed to forget that report - this bug has exactly the same symptoms] And Iain actually did fix it back then: http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.221.1326102842.16222.d....@puremagic.com http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.233.1326132966.16222.d....@puremagic.com But somehow the bug is now back... artur
