2012/2/15 mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com>: > On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson >>> <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson >>>>> <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw >>>>>> <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >>>>>>> <vitja.maka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu>: >>>>>>>>>> All of Sage passes except for one test: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py >>>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>>>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>>>>>>>> line 970: >>>>>>>>>> sage: >>>>>>>>>> sage_getargspec(bernstein_polynomial_factory_ratlist.coeffs_bitsize) >>>>>>>>>> Expected: >>>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None) >>>>>>>>>> Got: >>>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=()) >>>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>>>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>>>>>>>> line 973: >>>>>>>>>> sage: sage_getargspec(BooleanMonomialMonoid.gen) >>>>>>>>>> Expected: >>>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, >>>>>>>>>> defaults=(0,)) >>>>>>>>>> Got: >>>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, >>>>>>>>>> defaults=()) >>>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>>> 1 items had failures: >>>>>>>>>> 2 of 31 in __main__.example_21 >>>>>>>>>> ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any ideas why this would have changed? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CyFunction now provides its own code object. So inspect.getargs() is >>>>>>>>> called instead of >>>>>>>>> inspect.ArgSpec(*_sage_getargspec_cython(sage_getsource(obj))). It >>>>>>>>> seems like func.func_defaults should be implemented. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've created a pull request: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/88 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! The only other thing I can think of was a question of using >>>>>>> caching to mitigate the longer compile times, but I can't remember if >>>>>>> this was resolved. >>>>>> >>>>>> The compiler has like 2 or 3 seconds of constant overhead if you use >>>>>> memoryviews. >>>>> >>>>> That'd be nice to cut down, but certainly not a blocker. >>>>> >>>>>>> As I'm going to be MIA any day now, someone else should take up the >>>>>>> banner to push this long awaited release. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Missing in action"? Are you planning to desert? :) I can't find any >>>>>> relevant abbreviation, but I think I know what it means, >>>>>> congratulations in advance. >>>>> >>>>> Twin boys coming any day now! >>>> >>>> And the Cython team just keeps on growing! >>> >>> :) >>> >>>>>> Stefan, you have been involved the longest, would you feel up to the >>>>>> task? You probably have the best understanding and experience with any >>>>>> issues (no pressure :). Otherwise I could have a try... >>>>> >>>>> It's pretty easy. Once the defaults change is in it's probably worth >>>>> cutting a beta or release candidate to email to dev/users, and if >>>>> there's no blocking feedback you go ahead and push it out (basically >>>>> writing up the release notes on the wiki, cleaning up trac, tagging >>>>> the repository, making sure everything we care about on hudson is >>>>> still passing, uploading to pypi and the website (the sdist tarball), >>>>> emailing our lists and python-announce, re-building and updating the >>>>> pointer to the documentation, ...) If it goes on for a while it's >>>>> worth making/using a release branch on github. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the summary, I'm sure I would have missed one or two :) Ok, >>>> I'll volunteer then. Maybe I can create a beta somewhere next week and >>>> then we can see the community tear it apart. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> - Robert >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cython-devel mailing list >>> cython-devel@python.org >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >> >> Sorry, my previous email with attachment bounced. Here goes. >> >> I'm getting a substantial amount of failing tests on MSVC, >> https://gist.github.com/1836766. I think most complex number tests are >> failing because they cast >> a struct of a certain type to itself like ((struct_A) my_struct_A), >> which MSVC doesn't allow. >> >> Some tests seem to fail because they can't be imported: "compiling (c) >> and running numpy_parallel: ImportError: No module named >> numpy_parallel". >> >> And then there is a huge number of permission errors: WindowsError: >> [Error 5] Access is denied: >> 'c:\\Users\\mark\\cython\\BUILD\\compile\\cpp\\libc_math.pyd' . Maybe >> something is broken in the test runner (or in my setup somehow)? > > The pasted output is a little munged because it was redirected to a > log (and stdout is probably block buffering, something we could also > fix to line buffering).
I've merged cydefaults branch and now sage-tests is blue. -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
