On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson >> <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson >>>> <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >>>>>> <vitja.maka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu>: >>>>>>>>> All of Sage passes except for one test: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py >>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>>>>>>> line 970: >>>>>>>>> sage: >>>>>>>>> sage_getargspec(bernstein_polynomial_factory_ratlist.coeffs_bitsize) >>>>>>>>> Expected: >>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None) >>>>>>>>> Got: >>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=()) >>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>>>>>>> line 973: >>>>>>>>> sage: sage_getargspec(BooleanMonomialMonoid.gen) >>>>>>>>> Expected: >>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, >>>>>>>>> defaults=(0,)) >>>>>>>>> Got: >>>>>>>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, >>>>>>>>> defaults=()) >>>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>>> 1 items had failures: >>>>>>>>> 2 of 31 in __main__.example_21 >>>>>>>>> ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas why this would have changed? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CyFunction now provides its own code object. So inspect.getargs() is >>>>>>>> called instead of >>>>>>>> inspect.ArgSpec(*_sage_getargspec_cython(sage_getsource(obj))). It >>>>>>>> seems like func.func_defaults should be implemented. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've created a pull request: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/88 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! The only other thing I can think of was a question of using >>>>>> caching to mitigate the longer compile times, but I can't remember if >>>>>> this was resolved. >>>>> >>>>> The compiler has like 2 or 3 seconds of constant overhead if you use >>>>> memoryviews. >>>> >>>> That'd be nice to cut down, but certainly not a blocker. >>>> >>>>>> As I'm going to be MIA any day now, someone else should take up the >>>>>> banner to push this long awaited release. >>>>> >>>>> "Missing in action"? Are you planning to desert? :) I can't find any >>>>> relevant abbreviation, but I think I know what it means, >>>>> congratulations in advance. >>>> >>>> Twin boys coming any day now! >>> >>> And the Cython team just keeps on growing! >> >> :) >> >>>>> Stefan, you have been involved the longest, would you feel up to the >>>>> task? You probably have the best understanding and experience with any >>>>> issues (no pressure :). Otherwise I could have a try... >>>> >>>> It's pretty easy. Once the defaults change is in it's probably worth >>>> cutting a beta or release candidate to email to dev/users, and if >>>> there's no blocking feedback you go ahead and push it out (basically >>>> writing up the release notes on the wiki, cleaning up trac, tagging >>>> the repository, making sure everything we care about on hudson is >>>> still passing, uploading to pypi and the website (the sdist tarball), >>>> emailing our lists and python-announce, re-building and updating the >>>> pointer to the documentation, ...) If it goes on for a while it's >>>> worth making/using a release branch on github. >>> >>> Thanks for the summary, I'm sure I would have missed one or two :) Ok, >>> I'll volunteer then. Maybe I can create a beta somewhere next week and >>> then we can see the community tear it apart. >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Robert >> _______________________________________________ >> cython-devel mailing list >> cython-devel@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > > Sorry, my previous email with attachment bounced. Here goes. > > I'm getting a substantial amount of failing tests on MSVC, > https://gist.github.com/1836766. I think most complex number tests are > failing because they cast > a struct of a certain type to itself like ((struct_A) my_struct_A), > which MSVC doesn't allow. > > Some tests seem to fail because they can't be imported: "compiling (c) > and running numpy_parallel: ImportError: No module named > numpy_parallel". > > And then there is a huge number of permission errors: WindowsError: > [Error 5] Access is denied: > 'c:\\Users\\mark\\cython\\BUILD\\compile\\cpp\\libc_math.pyd' . Maybe > something is broken in the test runner (or in my setup somehow)?
The pasted output is a little munged because it was redirected to a log (and stdout is probably block buffering, something we could also fix to line buffering). _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
