On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: >>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu>: >>>> All of Sage passes except for one test: >>>> >>>> sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py >>>> ********************************************************************** >>>> File >>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>> line 970: >>>> sage: >>>> sage_getargspec(bernstein_polynomial_factory_ratlist.coeffs_bitsize) >>>> Expected: >>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None) >>>> Got: >>>> ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=()) >>>> ********************************************************************** >>>> File >>>> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", >>>> line 973: >>>> sage: sage_getargspec(BooleanMonomialMonoid.gen) >>>> Expected: >>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=(0,)) >>>> Got: >>>> ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=()) >>>> ********************************************************************** >>>> 1 items had failures: >>>> 2 of 31 in __main__.example_21 >>>> ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. >>>> >>>> Any ideas why this would have changed? >>>> >>> >>> CyFunction now provides its own code object. So inspect.getargs() is >>> called instead of >>> inspect.ArgSpec(*_sage_getargspec_cython(sage_getsource(obj))). It >>> seems like func.func_defaults should be implemented. >>> >>> >> >> I've created a pull request: >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/88 > > Thanks! The only other thing I can think of was a question of using > caching to mitigate the longer compile times, but I can't remember if > this was resolved.
The compiler has like 2 or 3 seconds of constant overhead if you use memoryviews. > As I'm going to be MIA any day now, someone else should take up the > banner to push this long awaited release. "Missing in action"? Are you planning to desert? :) I can't find any relevant abbreviation, but I think I know what it means, congratulations in advance. Stefan, you have been involved the longest, would you feel up to the task? You probably have the best understanding and experience with any issues (no pressure :). Otherwise I could have a try... > - Robert > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
