2011/11/4 mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com>: > On 29 October 2011 17:40, Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2011/10/29 Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>: >>> mark florisson, 28.10.2011 22:59: >>>> >>>> On 28 October 2011 21:55, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>>> >>>>> With Mark's fused types and memory views going in, I think it's about >>>>> time for a new release. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> I still haven't investigated the decorator issue that appeared in the Sage >>> tests. I think it's related to decorators on module level def functions, >>> which would suggest that it's best to eventually fix it as part of the >>> function implementation changes that Vitja has started. But there may still >>> be a simpler work-around somewhere that I'm not seeing yet. >>> >> >> Recently I've implemented py3k-super and dynamic default args if we >> have time. I would see this in release also. >> >> Can you please point me to sage decorators related failure? >> >> >>> I basically broke the Sage tests by resolving a bug (593 IIRC), and both >>> don't currently work together. So, a variant would be to revert my changes >>> for 0.16 and just leave the bug in, if that keeps us from breaking existing >>> code for now. >>> >>> But even leaving that out, the Sage tests look seriously broken currently: >>> >>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/All/job/sage-tests/lastCompletedBuild/consoleFull >>> >>> >>>> That'd be cool. However there are a few outstanding issues: >>>> a) the compiler is somewhat slower (possible solution: lazy utility >>>> codes) >>>> b) there's a potential memory leak problem for memoryviews with >>>> object dtype that contain themselves, this still needs investigation. >>>> >>>> As for a), Stefan mentioned code spending a lot of time in sub. >>>> Stefan, could you post the code for this that made Cython compile very >>>> slowly? >>> >>> At the time, I just ran cProfile on runtests.py with something like >>> "withstat with_stat" or so as tests - basically all with-statement related >>> ones. It took about 20 seconds or so to build the utility code, just to >>> throw it away unused afterwards. The compile/test run itself then took about >>> 3 seconds. >>> >> >> >> -- >> vitja. >> _______________________________________________ >> cython-devel mailing list >> cython-devel@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >> > > With Vitja's super() ready and with fused classmethods and > staticmethods ready, I think we're almost ready for a release. I also > supported cdef class static methods (previously it gave compiler > crashes). >
That's nice. I've also implemented support for dynamic default args http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/674 I think it could be merged either. > I think we should also merge pull requests 'casting to template > pointer' (after a test is added), and probably 'Makefile: rework repo > creation target' (although I haven't looked at it closely). I think > cythonize() is also worth documenting better, as it's a pretty neat > feature that should be more prominent and easier to find for users > (including examples of some of the #distutils directives). > -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
