On 29 October 2011 17:40, Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/10/29 Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>: >> mark florisson, 28.10.2011 22:59: >>> >>> On 28 October 2011 21:55, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>> >>>> With Mark's fused types and memory views going in, I think it's about >>>> time for a new release. >> >> Agreed. >> >> >>>> Thoughts? >> >> I still haven't investigated the decorator issue that appeared in the Sage >> tests. I think it's related to decorators on module level def functions, >> which would suggest that it's best to eventually fix it as part of the >> function implementation changes that Vitja has started. But there may still >> be a simpler work-around somewhere that I'm not seeing yet. >> > > Recently I've implemented py3k-super and dynamic default args if we > have time. I would see this in release also. > > Can you please point me to sage decorators related failure? > > >> I basically broke the Sage tests by resolving a bug (593 IIRC), and both >> don't currently work together. So, a variant would be to revert my changes >> for 0.16 and just leave the bug in, if that keeps us from breaking existing >> code for now. >> >> But even leaving that out, the Sage tests look seriously broken currently: >> >> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/All/job/sage-tests/lastCompletedBuild/consoleFull >> >> >>> That'd be cool. However there are a few outstanding issues: >>> a) the compiler is somewhat slower (possible solution: lazy utility >>> codes) >>> b) there's a potential memory leak problem for memoryviews with >>> object dtype that contain themselves, this still needs investigation. >>> >>> As for a), Stefan mentioned code spending a lot of time in sub. >>> Stefan, could you post the code for this that made Cython compile very >>> slowly? >> >> At the time, I just ran cProfile on runtests.py with something like >> "withstat with_stat" or so as tests - basically all with-statement related >> ones. It took about 20 seconds or so to build the utility code, just to >> throw it away unused afterwards. The compile/test run itself then took about >> 3 seconds. >> > > > -- > vitja. > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >
With Vitja's super() ready and with fused classmethods and staticmethods ready, I think we're almost ready for a release. I also supported cdef class static methods (previously it gave compiler crashes). I think we should also merge pull requests 'casting to template pointer' (after a test is added), and probably 'Makefile: rework repo creation target' (although I haven't looked at it closely). I think cythonize() is also worth documenting better, as it's a pretty neat feature that should be more prominent and easier to find for users (including examples of some of the #distutils directives). _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
