On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: > mark florisson, 28.10.2011 22:59: >> >> On 28 October 2011 21:55, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> With Mark's fused types and memory views going in, I think it's about >>> time for a new release. > > Agreed. > > >>> Thoughts? > > I still haven't investigated the decorator issue that appeared in the Sage > tests. I think it's related to decorators on module level def functions, > which would suggest that it's best to eventually fix it as part of the > function implementation changes that Vitja has started. But there may still > be a simpler work-around somewhere that I'm not seeing yet. > > I basically broke the Sage tests by resolving a bug (593 IIRC), and both > don't currently work together. So, a variant would be to revert my changes > for 0.16 and just leave the bug in, if that keeps us from breaking existing > code for now. > > But even leaving that out, the Sage tests look seriously broken currently: > > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/All/job/sage-tests/lastCompletedBuild/consoleFull
I recently fixed the Sage build (the errors on public api for non public types broke it). As for those tests, they seem to be related to name mangling for double-underscore names. Did something change here recently? Or is it indirectly due to decorators (I haven't looked too deeply yet.) >> That'd be cool. However there are a few outstanding issues: >> a) the compiler is somewhat slower (possible solution: lazy utility >> codes) >> b) there's a potential memory leak problem for memoryviews with >> object dtype that contain themselves, this still needs investigation. >> >> As for a), Stefan mentioned code spending a lot of time in sub. >> Stefan, could you post the code for this that made Cython compile very >> slowly? > > At the time, I just ran cProfile on runtests.py with something like > "withstat with_stat" or so as tests - basically all with-statement related > ones. It took about 20 seconds or so to build the utility code, just to > throw it away unused afterwards. The compile/test run itself then took about > 3 seconds. > > Stefan > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
