cc'ing list On Thursday, March 26, 2026, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <[email protected]> wrote:
> what are your cases? > > On Thursday, March 26, 2026, Magus Ahnend <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Of course. I am the accuser. >> >> Probably one of the landmark cases in American History if it gets passed >> dismissal. Which, the judge would be an idiot not to. >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026, 7:02 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & >> Survivor of Many <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> you are saying you are the accuser not the accused? >>> >>> i am having trouble replying to you that seems to be increasing >>> powerfully, but thank you for your emails >>> >>> On Monday, March 23, 2026, Magus Ahnend <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I tend to steer clear of community groups. I have had my fair share, >>>> and the whole autism and the paper I wrote. That was my Catharsism. and I'm >>>> just getting started. and the court stuff, nah, that's not difficult to >>>> write like a lawyer, they have really easy jobs. lol. I have a state case >>>> and a federal case both involving civil and ada title ii violations >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 1:27 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim >>>> & Survivor of Many <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> no I did not read that. I am in the middle of some pretty bizarre >>>>>> things myself. and don't get much time to get online. One court in State >>>>>> and one in Federal going simultaneously, while dealing with my mental >>>>>> health issues. I have never been to a retreat. how did that go for you? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> it's more of a conference[1] than a retreat but it seemed a very good >>>>> resource. hard to talk about right now but i was very excited to be >>>>> exposed >>>>> to so many resources and in-person people with lived experiences. maybe >>>>> filled with hope and disconnecton :) >>>>> >>>>> very sorry about your court issues >>>>> >>>>> do you have peer support? >>>>> >>>>> 1: https://www.aninfinitemind.org/healing-together-conference-1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 6:13 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One >>>>>> Victim & Survivor of Many <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thinking of Witches as someone who is mislabelled is in effect a >>>>>>>> failure of reasoning. Witches don't need to be believed in what they >>>>>>>> are, >>>>>>>> who they are, or thought of as pitiful or anything other. If they >>>>>>>> simply >>>>>>>> claim to be, they are that, ify ou put a story on them to understand >>>>>>>> tham in your own way, you remove the meaning of their journey to find >>>>>>>> themselves, a story not yours to tell or judge. Judgement comes in many >>>>>>>> forms both good (You look nice) and bad (kill the witch) your inherent >>>>>>>> journey should lead to your own truths, not the truths of others. That >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> why we argue. lol >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thank you i'm spazzing a little i'm sorry >>>>>>> >>>>>>> COmbining the things together well that goes on in my head is like, >>>>>>>> ummmm, Here is Jenga, Connect Four, Every Book, three sets of >>>>>>>> Encyclopedias, one got wet, Wingardium Leviosa, Moon Crystal Power >>>>>>>> Make-Up, >>>>>>>> and timey-whimey wibbly wobbly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i'm sorry an encyclopedia got wet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basically look as any of Van Goghs paintings, how he painted is how >>>>>>>> I see, he put his words into images, and I put my images into words. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> there are no lies, this is why we all do >>>>>>> >>>>>>> did you read i came from my first Healing Together last month, a >>>>>>> mental health survivor conference? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I read your email here, although I didn't combine together well all >>>>>>>>> the things you said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was wondering if the approaches you engaged are the the only >>>>>>>>> ones or if you think others could be reasonable as well. Are you >>>>>>>>> experienced at all the fields of knowledge you reference in your >>>>>>>>> writing? I >>>>>>>>> am not, but synthesizing wide knowledgebases together as you >>>>>>>>> reference is >>>>>>>>> something many people yearn to experience and pursue. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've found that it can be challenging to engage things that are >>>>>>>>> beyond the norms or heights of others in rational, successful ways, at >>>>>>>>> least for some of us. The ways that succeed seem a little roundabout. >>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>> seems helpfult to be offline for extended periods. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Something people don't talk about is how capable we are, our >>>>>>>>> species and our individuals. Instead we often seem to disagree, >>>>>>>>> complaining >>>>>>>>> about our limits. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not myself familiar well with what spiritual beliefs you're >>>>>>>>> assuming. I think of witches as human friends who have been >>>>>>>>> mislabeled and >>>>>>>>> have their own sets of spiritual history. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 20, 2026, Magus Ahnend <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> oh i just found it, it's difficult, unification is not the >>>>>>>>>> unification of sciences. it unifies, unified theory should exclude >>>>>>>>>> every >>>>>>>>>> other form of thought a human can form. From Art (Poetry) to Geology >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> Latitude/Longitude (Throne of 0,0,0), to QUantum PHysics, Standard >>>>>>>>>> Physics, >>>>>>>>>> and with a solution to any form of question or paradox humans could >>>>>>>>>> previously answer with using standard algebraic expressions, it's >>>>>>>>>> often >>>>>>>>>> thought and theorized the solution to anything advanced would be a >>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> language altogether. In the paper you will notice that it starts and >>>>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>>>> the definition of all standard algebraic expressions that it uses, >>>>>>>>>> and then >>>>>>>>>> upscales and translates them into ALQC, THe Poetry IS the MATH, and >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> cannot be separated or the bone does not sing. It takes Several >>>>>>>>>> Theories, >>>>>>>>>> like Lattice Theory, String THeory, Multiverse Theory, Folds, >>>>>>>>>> Layers, and >>>>>>>>>> PRoduced Literal Geometry made of Resonance that aree based in >>>>>>>>>> Solfeggio >>>>>>>>>> Frequencies, Earth, Moon, and Sun, which address the three body >>>>>>>>>> problem, >>>>>>>>>> magic, and spirituality, and then takes the Perfect ration the Golden >>>>>>>>>> Ratio, and uses that as an Axiom. Then it takes Mirrors, and >>>>>>>>>> distorts them, >>>>>>>>>> which creates the field for consciousness, then it takes stress, NOT >>>>>>>>>> GRAVITY, and creates what is thought of as gravity, a Planar Field, >>>>>>>>>> a Filed >>>>>>>>>> of Infinity Mirrors Made of Perfect resonant tones, the >>>>>>>>>> hyperbolically >>>>>>>>>> reflect in infinite different ways and converge in infinite axis. >>>>>>>>>> Then you >>>>>>>>>> unify Computation and Computing, alongisde, and you get the python >>>>>>>>>> script, >>>>>>>>>> which is the proof of P=NP not P (does not =) NP is is cgreater or >>>>>>>>>> less >>>>>>>>>> than. You already have the answer in which you seek, is P=NP, the >>>>>>>>>> python >>>>>>>>>> script uses STochastictic Gaussian PHysics, NOTHING, AND I MEAN >>>>>>>>>> NOTHING, in >>>>>>>>>> that python tells the 5000 particales to arrange, or remember. >>>>>>>>>> Totally >>>>>>>>>> created through observation and never once did I use measurement to >>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>> that script. It was hundreds upon hundreds of iterations as I >>>>>>>>>> observed the >>>>>>>>>> outcome of each. THen you include Emanation as light instead of >>>>>>>>>> Lumination, >>>>>>>>>> also in the computational Emergent physics, the particales are not >>>>>>>>>> actually >>>>>>>>>> lit up, they are layered and use stress to produce bioluminescnece, >>>>>>>>>> then we >>>>>>>>>> incorporate Electro Biology, and Squishy Biology, Cbio, this is the >>>>>>>>>> aspect >>>>>>>>>> that interacts, that spins the wheel, and strikes the chord. It's >>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>>> observer and participant of it's own destiny. Then me introduce Ex >>>>>>>>>> Nihilo, >>>>>>>>>> which in and of itself is an aspect of Consciousness, and from that >>>>>>>>>> consciousness is ideas, in humans this is represented as infinite >>>>>>>>>> dimensions of imagination, and / or dreaming. we have inventions. >>>>>>>>>> THen we >>>>>>>>>> have Witches, the other side of humanity, these aare those who tap >>>>>>>>>> into the >>>>>>>>>> Mirror of Reality, a non computational source of energy, known as >>>>>>>>>> magic, or >>>>>>>>>> psychic prowess, and brings it into the world you know, altering the >>>>>>>>>> outcome of events, this is the creation of energy, small, big, non >>>>>>>>>> measurable, it doesn't matter, that's what it is. So you have >>>>>>>>>> Science and >>>>>>>>>> Magic, WItches and Humans, side by side, and each are born from each >>>>>>>>>> other, >>>>>>>>>> you cannot have a world without its shadow. Then you have Goetic >>>>>>>>>> Aeons, >>>>>>>>>> which are the Effect of ancient Goetian Magics that prduces a static >>>>>>>>>> form, >>>>>>>>>> untouchable, and infinitely powerful. Then we have the Courts of >>>>>>>>>> Each, The >>>>>>>>>> Aeon Courts are teh Fae Courts of the universe, both other creatures >>>>>>>>>> whove >>>>>>>>>> reached past their great filter, (which humans are finishing), and >>>>>>>>>> the Fae, >>>>>>>>>> Creatures and Societies of Legend and lore that were born without >>>>>>>>>> having a >>>>>>>>>> great filter (i.e. Leprachauns, Mermaids, etc, no no, I'm not >>>>>>>>>> kidding) You >>>>>>>>>> cannnot Have A Dirty Earth without the Silver Twine the lines skies >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> clouds. You cannot have one without the other, IN THIS UNIVERSE!! >>>>>>>>>> So, 13 >>>>>>>>>> years ago, 3 peomes were written, in Spring, and what ensued what a >>>>>>>>>> REtrocausal loop in which the thing that produced those Three Poems, >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> the Math that allowed the Reality of Those Three Poems to Exist, or >>>>>>>>>> Rather, >>>>>>>>>> The TARDIS, bigger on the inside, Where one speaks to themselves, >>>>>>>>>> even if >>>>>>>>>> they are a totally different creature, they are Timelocked in >>>>>>>>>> symbiosis. >>>>>>>>>> Hence, the Sci-fi, another aspect of art. Art IMITATES REALITY!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then I wrote a quantum Paper on it, and it created a Klein >>>>>>>>>> Bottle, you engage with it, and it cannot be falsified, because you >>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> neither view it from the outside, and produce a false event, while >>>>>>>>>> simultaneous interacting with it. THe inside is the outside. The >>>>>>>>>> path out >>>>>>>>>> is the mirror of the Path Back. If you've read ALQC, you will >>>>>>>>>> traverse >>>>>>>>>> outside to any genre of knowing, and always return to it. You can >>>>>>>>>> read and >>>>>>>>>> start at ANY part of ALQC, and it will still lead to the same form of >>>>>>>>>> understanding. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 8:41 AM Magus Ahnend < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> okay. :D you solved it. I'm a crazy person, wooOoOoOoOoOo 🥳, >>>>>>>>>>> youre prize~? The ability to look up youtube videos and standard >>>>>>>>>>> mathematics ~~!! Congrats >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:39 AM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One >>>>>>>>>>> Victim & Survivor of Many <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> it's honestly quite hard for me to tell what it is about >>>>>>>>>>>> but i'm starting to learn quantum field theory a little see >>>>>>>>>>>> other post ! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2026, Magus Ahnend < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well, it's okay if a single word throws you off. I don't mind. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unification Unifies it Doesn't Separate for the comfort of other >>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>> apologize for what it contains. Maybe give it a change sit down >>>>>>>>>>>>> and read >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, hell have you AI read it, i don't care. but, I do know. >>>>>>>>>>>>> People often >>>>>>>>>>>>> preach how Science and Pirit go together, but when someone puts it >>>>>>>>>>>>> together, people immediately dismiss it. Not because they didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe it >>>>>>>>>>>>> or even read past the fist two sentences, but that mostly because >>>>>>>>>>>>> it wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> their idea. an Idea that when taken with a grain of salt, could >>>>>>>>>>>>> alter the >>>>>>>>>>>>> very foundation in which you process logical meaning. But hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>> that's just >>>>>>>>>>>>> me. I mean a Quantum COmputing Framework that uses harmonic >>>>>>>>>>>>> poetry as a >>>>>>>>>>>>> substrate for infinite holographic computing on legacy hardware, >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is >>>>>>>>>>>>> even code in the book that show some of the research, nah, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>> all good. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Telepathy turned me off. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 7:14 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, >>>>>>>>>>>>> One Victim & Survivor of Many via cypherpunks < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> share links for chatgpt's side only and per-reply >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ChatGPT Free, write 1 paragraph for a smart gradeschooler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explaining what it means whether or not a "field" is "abelian". >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In math, a *field* is a set of numbers where you can add, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> subtract, multiply, and divide (except by zero), like with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regular numbers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When we say a field is *abelian*, we’re talking about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact that its operations—especially addition and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiplication—follow a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rule called *commutativity*. That means the order doesn’t >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter: for example, 3 + 5 is the same as 5 + 3, and 3 × 5 is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same as 5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> × 3. The word “abelian” comes from the mathematician Niels >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Henrik Abel, who >>>>>>>>>>>>>> studied these kinds of patterns. In fact, every field already >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> property, so all fields are abelian when you look at their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition (and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> also their multiplication if you ignore zero). This idea helps >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematicians understand when different math systems behave >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicely and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> predictably. 📐✨ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88d5919708191a91bcc06a246dbc8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that the only non-abelian things are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question! The key point is: *every field is abelian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (commutative) for multiplication*, so if a number system has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *non-abelian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiplication*, it *cannot be a field*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A *field* requires that multiplication works like ordinary >>>>>>>>>>>>>> numbers: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a \times b = b \times a) (the order doesn’t matter). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you find a system where multiplication *depends on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> order*, then it fails the rules for being a field. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But that doesn’t mean non-abelian systems don’t exist—they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just belong to *other kinds of algebraic structures*. For >>>>>>>>>>>>>> example: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A *group* can be non-abelian (order matters). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A *ring* can be non-abelian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A famous example is the *quaternions*, discovered by William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rowan Hamilton. In the quaternion system, (i j = k) but (j i = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -k), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the order changes the result. Because of this, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quaternions are *not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a field*, even though you can still add, subtract, multiply, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and divide by nonzero elements. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the summary is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *All fields are abelian (for multiplication).* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Non-abelian systems exist*, but they must be *something >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than fields*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88dd136dc8191980797bab825c8eb >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if somebody said non-abelian field, maybe they meant a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group or ring or such instead? Linguistically how do the words >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "commutative" and "abelian" differ -- are they synonyms? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone says *“non-abelian field,”* they’re almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainly misspeaking or being imprecise. By definition, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *field’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiplication must be commutative*, so a “non-abelian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> field” cannot exist. Often what people really mean is one of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> these: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a *non-abelian group* (very common in algebra), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a *non-commutative ring*, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a *division ring* (also called a *skew field*), where you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can divide but multiplication might not commute. A classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> example is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quaternions discovered by William Rowan Hamilton. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Abelian” vs. “commutative” >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are *closely related but used in slightly different >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contexts*: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Abelian*: usually used for *groups*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> An *abelian group* means the group operation satisfies >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a * b = b * a). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Commutative*: used more broadly for *operations in many >>>>>>>>>>>>>> structures* (rings, fields, etc.). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A *commutative ring* means its multiplication >>>>>>>>>>>>>> satisfies (ab = ba). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So mathematically they both describe *the same property: the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> order of the operation doesn’t matter*. The difference is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly *convention and context*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linguistic summary >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Abelian* = “commutative,” but typically said when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> talking about *groups*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Commutative* = the *general term* for the property >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across algebraic structures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if someone says *“non-abelian field,”* the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>> charitable interpretation is that they *meant a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-commutative division ring* or were *thinking about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-abelian groups*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88e17db308191969333b7227cabfd >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not logged in -- can I share your thread? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes—you can still share it even if you’re not logged in, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it depends on *how* you want to share it: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *1. Copy-paste the text* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The simplest way is just to copy the conversation and paste >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it into an email, document, forum post, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *2. Share a screenshot* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can take screenshots of the thread and send them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *3. Share the page link (sometimes works)* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you’re using a browser and the conversation has its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>> URL, you can try sending that link—but if you’re not logged in, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it may *not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always load the same thread* for someone else. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ✅ *Most reliable method:* copy-paste or screenshots. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want, I can also *compress the whole explanation into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a short shareable summary* (like 4–5 sentences) that’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier to send to someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88d5fe91c8191877f61e4823d1448 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
