----- Original Message ----- From: petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The point is that you are *forcing* me to part with my > productive labor to support someone else. > > This makes me unhappy. Under your beliefs, you can't do this, > as I have a right to be happy. If this were an episode on the original tv series "Star Trek," this would be the point where SaperRobot notices the contradiction, freezes up, and Kirk and Spock push him into the Transporter and beam him out to infinity. Roll credits. Commercial. Etc. Jim Bell (for a big laugh, try: www.slaphillary.com )
- Re: why should it be trusted? Ray Dillinger
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Bill Stewart
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Ray Dillinger
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? James A.. Donald
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? jim bell
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Risk and insurance Greg Broiles
- Re: Risk and insurance Tim May
- Re: Risk and insurance Bill Stewart
