At 12:33 AM 10/22/00 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote: >On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote: > > >> So these people are entitled to something for nothing? > >> (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)? > > > >That's the whole idea of insurance, isn't it? > > > >You're trolling, aren't you? > >Insurance is a good idea for the insured because it takes >money to make money. On the topic of risk and insurance, and apropos discussion of reading lists, cypherpunks may find the book "Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk" by Peter Bernstein of interest. -- Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? jim bell
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: Risk and insurance Greg Broiles
- Re: Risk and insurance Tim May
- Re: Risk and insurance Bill Stewart
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- RE: why should it be trusted? Trei, Peter
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? James A. Donald
