On Feb 23 07:59, Richard Elberger wrote: > Awesome ;) Thanks so much I will keep a look out for it and verify on > my end that the perl unit test works as expected. > > > > On Feb 23, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Feb 21 16:17, Richard Elberger wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I found this while trying to compile perl 5.20.1 on latest cygwin64 > >> (just updated yesterday). > >> > >> Effectively, sigaddset is adding a signal along these lines. If > >> signal x is less than 32, then two signals are added: x and x+32. If > >> signal x is greater than 32, then again two signals are added, x and > >> x-32. > >> > >> It’s been far too many years since I’ve written C but the attached > >> code snippet to prove it (hopefully it proves it) … and running the > >> same “code” (I put that in quotes because it’s like preschool C) on > >> any Linux works as expected - just adding the one signal. > >> > >> This is causing the sigset.t test for the POSIX module in perl core to > >> fail. There are a ton of other failures in testing 5.20.1 core but > >> hopefully they’re not all cygwin related like this one. > > > > Thanks a lot for the testcase. I fixed the problem (an int overflow > > computing a bit mask) in CVS. I'll generate a developer snapshot on > > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and probably another Cygwin 1.7.35 test > > release soon. Both will contain that patch.
Snapshots are up. Please give it a try. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpTdaF8uczfp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
