Awesome ;) Thanks so much I will keep a look out for it and verify on my end that the perl unit test works as expected.
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com> > wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > On Feb 21 16:17, Richard Elberger wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I found this while trying to compile perl 5.20.1 on latest cygwin64 >> (just updated yesterday). >> >> Effectively, sigaddset is adding a signal along these lines. If >> signal x is less than 32, then two signals are added: x and x+32. If >> signal x is greater than 32, then again two signals are added, x and >> x-32. >> >> It’s been far too many years since I’ve written C but the attached >> code snippet to prove it (hopefully it proves it) … and running the >> same “code” (I put that in quotes because it’s like preschool C) on >> any Linux works as expected - just adding the one signal. >> >> This is causing the sigset.t test for the POSIX module in perl core to >> fail. There are a ton of other failures in testing 5.20.1 core but >> hopefully they’re not all cygwin related like this one. > > Thanks a lot for the testcase. I fixed the problem (an int overflow > computing a bit mask) in CVS. I'll generate a developer snapshot on > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and probably another Cygwin 1.7.35 test > release soon. Both will contain that patch. > > > Thanks, > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
