On Sat, 31 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote: > On 26/05/2025 19:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On Sun, 25 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Should I add a big comment documenting the test failures, or a separate > > file? > No wrong answers. > > I guess I'd go for a separate file, but I don't mind. > > > PKG_NAMES="git2 libgit2_1_9 libgit2-devel" > > Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but I think the conventional name here is > "libgit2_1.9" (i.e. the underscore just separates the upstream name (when it > happens to end in digits) from a trailing soversion number, it doesn't replace > all the dots in it.
OK, wasn't sure, as soon as I saw that I was going to try to make a variable name with a dot in it, I went with the underscore. But it seems I just stick with the underscore in the variable names. > If we're going to package the 'git2' tool, maybe it should have a description > which makes it clearer what it's use is (debugging libgit2, not working with > git repor?) I wouldn't be opposed to either not package it, or stick it in libgit2-devel. I don't really know what it's used for tbh.
