On 26/05/2025 19:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
[...]
Should I add a big comment documenting the test failures, or a separate file?
No wrong answers. I guess I'd go for a separate file, but I don't mind.
PKG_NAMES="git2 libgit2_1_9 libgit2-devel"
Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but I think the conventional name here is "libgit2_1.9" (i.e. the underscore just separates the upstream name (when it happens to end in digits) from a trailing soversion number, it doesn't replace all the dots in it.
If we're going to package the 'git2' tool, maybe it should have a description which makes it clearer what it's use is (debugging libgit2, not working with git repor?)
Thanks.
