On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:40:04PM +0800, JonY wrote: >On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote: >>> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote: >>> >>>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you? There's no reason to keep gcc3 >>>> around anymore, is there? >>> >>> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide. >> >> I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it? We can't >> have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so. >> > >OK. > >Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on >packaging bugs. > >I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the >patches have been integrated yet.
Hmm. We're in a unique situation here where Dave Korn seems to think he's still the maintainer but isn't responding to email in cygwin-apps. Dave, could you please respond to cygwin-apps? cgf
