On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote: >> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote: >> >>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you? There's no reason to keep gcc3 >>> around anymore, is there? >> >> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide. > > I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it? We can't > have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so. >
OK. Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on packaging bugs. I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the patches have been integrated yet.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
