On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > (He remarked that the new Cabal installs both static and dynamic by > default; should that be dynamic only? Do others have opinions? > > This seems pretty urgent to me.
This seems pretty urgent to me as well. Is there some write-up about the decision behind the switch so I can better understand why it's changing and Cabal should adapt? Does e.g. GCC use dynamic by default? I don't think we want to do both static and dynamic by default, as it will double compile times which are already quite long. Cheers, Johan
_______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
