Dear All,

I suggest a professional approach to this question:

Please look at issue 442 and 520. Please read carefully the scope note of E19.

Temporary aggregates are in no way specific to E13.

In particular for moving objects, but also for exhibition arrangements, conservation etc., physically coherent items can participate in any number of temporary or permanent aggregates.

In 1998, we followed a presentation how the National Museum in Melbourne was completely moved. Vernon made the S/W. Traceability of the temporary aggregates was the major issue.

No reason to regard the aggregation of activities as better. My experience from creating collection management systems is that documenting temporary aggregates is in many cases more reliable. Both solutions should be mentioned, but documenting by temporary aggregates should be in our teaching program, people stumble over it since decades and it is very substantial. E19 scope note could even be enhanced.

Kind regards,

Martin

On 10/15/2025 4:40 PM, Robert Sanderson via Crm-sig wrote:

Conversely, I support Christian-Emil's proposed migration pattern of using an encapsulating event to collect together the attribute assignments. This pattern allows the transitive inclusion within further such higher order events as well, including the typical museum operations such as acquisition, accessioning, conservation, and so on.

Rob

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 5:10 AM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig <[email protected]> wrote:

    Dear All,

    I'd rather suggest to better group the aggregates as single
    instances of Physical Object, which corresponds to the way of
    handling of such "multiple items".

    Best,

    Martin

    On 10/8/2025 1:55 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
    Dear all,
    The Issue 700 is described in
    
https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-700-migration-instructions-for-e13-attribute-assignment-and-subclasses-and-its-properties-plus-their
    I have created a document in the Google drive,
    see
    
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TGR8ccpWSNcj4ZJZdVqxH_ax3x_jhn5neXyRuBh6l9Q

    with a draft for the migration rule. I put a copy of the draft at
    the end of this email.

    Best,
    Christian-Emil


    Migration Instructions for  E13 Attribute Assignment, subclasses
    and (sub)properties
    In cultural heritage institutions it is common practice to
    document condition assessment, measurement, classification,
    observation etc. for groups of objects. This has been reflected
    in the CRMbase by the quantification many-to-many of the
    properties P140 /assigned attribute to (was attributed by)/ and
    P141 /assigned (was assigned by)/ and their subproperties. From
    v7.3.1 and on, all instances of of E13 Attribute Assignment (and
    subclasses) forms a single activity applied to exactly one object
    and yielding one value or dimension, which prohibits multiple
    values or dimensions as the objects of one instance of E13
    Attribute Assignment (condition assessment, measurement,
    classification, observation, etc.). After the change one has to
    replace the single instance of E13 Attribute Assignment or
    subclasses with an instance of E7 Activity as the grouping event
    and a new instance of E13 Attribute Assignment or subclasses for
    each of the objects in question. The grouping instance should
    hold the information about time, place and actor of the original
    instance of E13 Attribute Assignment and a type indicating the
    kind of event. Each of the new instances of E13 Attribute
    Assignment or subclasses should be sub-events, that is connected
    to the new instance of E7 activity via the property P9 /consists
    of (forms part of)/




    _______________________________________________
    Crm-sig mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list


-- ------------------------------------
      Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
      Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
      Institute of Computer Science
      Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
      GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Email:[email protected] Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

    _______________________________________________
    Crm-sig mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list



--
Rob Sanderson
Senior Director for Digital Cultural Heritage
Yale University

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list


--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Email:[email protected] Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list

Reply via email to