cose  

Messages by Thread

• • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-05.txt Simo Sorce
• [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Orie
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Wang Guilin
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Gray
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Peter C
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Wang Guilin
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Wang Guilin
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Lucas Prabel
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Lucas Prabel
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Simo Sorce
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Neil Madden
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Simo Sorce
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Wang Guilin
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Wang Guilin
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Simo Sorce
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 tirumal reddy
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: [EXTERNAL] [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 John Gray
  • [COSE] Re: [EXTERNAL] [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: [EXTERNAL] [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 Tim Hollebeek
  • [COSE] Re: [jose] Re: Call for Adoption request: draft-prabel-jose-pq-composite-sigs-04 tirumal reddy
• [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-09 telechat Genart review Russ Housley via Datatracker
• [COSE] AD review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope Paul Wouters
  • [COSE] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope Paul Wouters
  • [COSE] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope Paul Wouters
• [COSE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-06.txt> (COSE Hash Envelope) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• [COSE] Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) lawrence reilly
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) Michael Richardson
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) lawrence reilly
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) Michael Richardson
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) lawrence reilly
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) Robin Bryce
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) lawrence reilly
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) Robin Bryce
  • [COSE] Re: Subject: Feedback Request: REM Protocol Draft (DOI + Blockchain Proofs) lawrence reilly
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-hpke-16.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Summary of Changes in draft-ietf-cose-hpke-16 Hannes Tschofenig
• [COSE] Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on charter-ietf-cose-04-00: (with COMMENT) Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker
• [COSE] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-06 Ivaylo Petrov via Datatracker
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-09.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on charter-ietf-cose-04-00: (with COMMENT) Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker
• [COSE] Protocol Action: 'COSE (CBOR Object Signing and Encryption) Receipts' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-17.txt) The IESG
• [COSE] [OPS-DIR] draft-ietf-cose-dilithium call Opsdir review tirumal reddy
  • [COSE] Re: [OPS-DIR] draft-ietf-cose-dilithium call Opsdir review Orie
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-17.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] New version of draft-ochkas-cose-ascon Dmytro OCHKAS
  • [COSE] New version of draft-ochkas-cose-ascon Dmytro OCHKAS
  • [COSE] Re: New version of draft-ochkas-cose-ascon Michael Jones
• [COSE] LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Tschofenig, Hannes
  • [COSE] Re: LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: LAMPS Attack applied to COSE Laurence Lundblade
• [COSE] Erik Kline's No Objection on charter-ietf-cose-04-00: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Erik Kline's No Objection on charter-ietf-cose-04-00: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker
• [COSE] cose - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 124 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-06.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-16.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-08.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Protocol Action: 'COSE Header parameter for RFC 3161 Time-Stamp Tokens' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-07.txt) The IESG
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-15.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 ietf last call Secdir review Peter Yee via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Re: draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 ietf last call Secdir review Orie
• [COSE] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-07: (with COMMENT) Deb Cooley via Datatracker
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-07.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-15.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Deb Cooley's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Deb Cooley via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Deb Cooley
• [COSE] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Mike Bishop via Datatracker
• [COSE] Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Gorry Fairhurst via Datatracker
• [COSE] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Deb Cooley via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Deb Cooley
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Orie
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Deb Cooley
• [COSE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
• [COSE] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• [COSE] draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
  • [COSE] Re: draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs Emil Lundberg
• [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 telechat Secdir review Stefan Santesson via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 telechat Secdir review Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 telechat Secdir review Stefan Santesson
  • [COSE] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 telechat Secdir review Stefan Santesson
  • [COSE] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 telechat Secdir review Paul Wouters
• [COSE] Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: (with COMMENT) Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker
• [COSE] Errata 8390 on RFC 9679 Orie
• [COSE] review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Falko Strenzke
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Emil Lundberg
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Falko Strenzke
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Emil Lundberg
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Falko Strenzke
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Emil Lundberg
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: review of draft-lundberg-cose-two-party-signing-algs-02 Emil Lundberg
• [COSE] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-bls-key-representations-07.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-06 Michael Jones via Datatracker
• [COSE] IETF 123: Formally verified implementation of CBOR, CDDL, COSE Tahina Ramananandro
• [COSE] Agenda and Request for Presentations COSE IETF 123 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: Agenda and Request for Presentations COSE IETF 123 Michael Jones
  • [COSE] Re: Agenda and Request for Presentations COSE IETF 123 Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: Agenda and Request for Presentations COSE IETF 123 Michael Jones
  • [COSE] Re: Agenda and Request for Presentations COSE IETF 123 Ivaylo Petrov
• [COSE] COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Hannes Tschofenig
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Hannes Tschofenig
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Brian Campbell
  • [COSE] Re: COSE_Mac with HPKE is very broken, right? Akira Tsukamoto | OPENCHIP
• [COSE] [IANA #1422949] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (jose) David Dong via RT
  • [COSE] Re: [IANA #1422949] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (jose) Filip Skokan
• [COSE] [IANA #1422948] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (cose) David Dong via RT
  • [COSE] [IANA #1422948] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (cose) David Dong via RT
  • [COSE] Re: [IANA #1422948] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (cose) Sean Turner
  • [COSE] Re: [IANA #1422948] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-dilithium (cose) Sean Turner
• [COSE] Fwd: FW: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-hybrid-hpke-08.txt tirumal reddy
• [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 ietf last call Genart review Russ Housley via Datatracker
  • [COSE] Re: draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 ietf last call Genart review Orie
  • [COSE] Re: draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 ietf last call Genart review Orie
• [COSE] ctx in "ML-DSA for JOSE and COSE" Emil Lundberg
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-hpke-15.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-hpke-14.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08.txt> (ML-DSA for JOSE and COSE) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] AD review draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-07 Paul Wouters
• [COSE] WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Michael Jones
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Marco Tiloca
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Göran Selander
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Marco Tiloca
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Göran Selander
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Göran Selander
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Ivaylo Petrov
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-15 Robert Moskowitz
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-15 Lijun Liao
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-15 Robert Moskowitz
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-15 Lijun Liao
  • [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14 Robert Moskowitz
• [COSE] Little-endian private key in draft-ietf-cose-bls-key-representations-06? Emil Lundberg
  • [COSE] Re: Little-endian private key in draft-ietf-cose-bls-key-representations-06? Ilari Liusvaara
• [COSE] Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Sipos, Brian J.
  • [COSE] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Sipos, Brian J.
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Michael Richardson
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Carsten Bormann
  • [COSE] Re: [EXT] Re: Requirement for protected header to actually be protected Sipos, Brian J.
• [COSE] IPR claims on COSE hash envelope Jon Geater
  • [COSE] Re: IPR claims on COSE hash envelope Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: IPR claims on COSE hash envelope Steve Lasker
• [COSE] cose - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 123 "IETF Secretariat"
• [COSE] Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Leonard Rosenthol
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Carsten Bormann
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Leonard Rosenthol
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Sipos, Brian J.
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? John Mattsson
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Quynh Dang
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Carsten Bormann
  • [COSE] Re: Why is SHA-3 not supported in COSE? Michael Jones
• [COSE] RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Nate Jones (Windows Security)
  • [COSE] Re: RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Ilari Liusvaara
  • [COSE] RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Nate Jones (Windows Security)
  • [COSE] Re: RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFC 9053 direct+HKDF: Nonce/Salt Requirement Inconsistency? Nate Jones (Windows Security)
• [COSE] Differences between COSE-HPKE and JOSE-HPKE Hannes Tschofenig
  • [COSE] Re: Differences between COSE-HPKE and JOSE-HPKE Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: Differences between COSE-HPKE and JOSE-HPKE Brian Campbell
  • [COSE] Re: Differences between COSE-HPKE and JOSE-HPKE Brian Campbell
• [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-14.txt internet-drafts
• [COSE] Constrained Node/Network Cluster @ IETF123: DRAFT AGENDA Carsten Bormann
• [COSE] Review of COSE Hash Envelope Jon Geater
  • [COSE] Re: [SCITT] Review of COSE Hash Envelope Dick Brooks
• [COSE] IETF 123 Call for COSE Agenda Items Ivaylo Petrov
• [COSE] Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Henk Birkholz
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Alexander Stein
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Alexander Stein
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Laurence Lundblade
  • [COSE] Re: Two concerns with publishing COSE HPKE Michael Richardson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages