Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have no transport-related observations. Please consider the following comments when revising this document: --- Introduction: COSE Receipts can include proves that a document is in a database (proof of inclusion) - Is this correct: /proves/ ? is this /proofs/? - or ... /can prove that a.../ --- /increase burden for implementers/ - insert /the/ before /burden/? --- /which corresponds to the log/ - could be /that corresponds to the log/ --- /It is recommended that implementations return a single boolean result for Receipt verification operations.../ - Please check, whether this ought to be a normative RECOMMENDED? --- and does /merkle tree/ have a capital 'M' or 'M' and 'T'? --- _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
