Hi John, On 2025-06-26, at 10:14, John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don’t remember the discussion, but SHAKE are the only variants of the SHA-3 > family you ever needed. The fixed length SHA-3 variant are quite useless, > they are slower and much less flexible. I think it would have been much > better if the fixed length SHA-3 were never standardized. Unfortunately the > naming often makes people miss SHAKE.
Should we ask for a note to be added by IANA to the SHAKE/TurboSHAKE registrations, containing the word “SHA-3” and explaining that there is no intention to use SHA-3 itself for the SHA-3 family? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
