On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:20:44 GMT, Justin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I believe we should. I will submit this issue to the translation team and >> have it fixed in the next drop. > > I don't see a reason why this change should occur since there was no > corresponding change in the original file for this time frame. Is the change > just reverting "non-private" and "private"? We might just spot revert this > change here (and still notify the translation team). > > "`中未找到非专用零参数构造器\n请从现有构造器中删除 private`" might be better than the original > translation, since `private` remains untranslated. Otherwise reverting back > to the original is fine with me as well. Good catch. I'm going with this option since it doesn't make sense. to update this line anyway when the original file didn't change this line. I'll submit the issue about these words not being translated nonetheless. Thanks! ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28802#discussion_r2620616201
