On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:41:09AM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote: > We already merged config.sub patches into binutils and gcc, and added > riscv-* support to them. So at this point I think we just have to > allow riscv-*-* even though we don't want it. I don't expect to use > it and I don't expect to maintain it, but some stubborn people will > never give up on it, so we have to allow it. > > I don't care about Liviu, but there is a riscv-rtems port rolling out. > We had agreement to expand riscv-rtems to riscv32-rtems at config.sub > time, but then you modified config.sub to remove the riscv->riscv32 > conversion, so the riscv-rtems port went out as just riscv-rtems and > we can't drop support for that now.
OK--I don't terribly mind what is done as long as it is clear and uniform. If you think riscv/riscv-* should be allowed, I am happy to put it back. Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
