On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:41:49AM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote: > Accepting riscv-linux isn't OK. That will cause complications. > Though I'm not sure if that can be easily avoided if we allow > riscv-elf.
> There are no plans for any tools to accept riscv- as a CPU, so > adding support for this to config.sub isn't very useful. In light of this, I have removed riscv- from config.sub because: > Most GNU tools accept --program-transform-name as a configure > option, so it is easy to strip off the 32 or 64 in the program name > at install time if you wish. That should solve Liviu's problem. .. I had forgotten about --program-transform-name. That will indeed solve the problem _if_ you want your toolchain binaries prefixed with riscv instead of riscv32/riscv64. Cheers, Ben PS: nice to hear from you, Jim.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
