> On 9 Jul 2018, at 12:20, Ben Elliston <b...@air.net.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:41:49AM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
>> Accepting riscv-linux isn't OK. That will cause complications.
>> Though I'm not sure if that can be easily avoided if we allow
>> riscv-elf.
>
>> There are no plans for any tools to accept riscv- as a CPU, so
>> adding support for this to config.sub isn't very useful.
>
> In light of this, I have removed riscv- from config.sub because:
This is regrettable.
Jim has no interest in embedded cross toolchains, but this does not mean that
there are no plans to accept `riscv-`, as proven by my binary distribution.
Jim anyway solved the config.gcc configuration, so the initial concerns were no
longer a priority.
If you decide to permanently deny `riscv-`, I'll no longer maintain the
embedded RISC-V toolchain, which, in my opinion, requires it.
Regards,
Liviu
_______________________________________________
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
