ege-st commented on PR #14197: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14197#issuecomment-2412571066
> > `/cluster/groovy/analyzer/static/config` API, > > Is this the right convention to use for such an API? Only until cluster/config/groovy are we doing a hierarchy, so perhaps something like cluster/configs/groovystaticConfig is a more apt name? I initially had that, but then I thought we might add additional Groovy security features (such as executing in a sandbox) in the future, and grouping Groovy configs under `cluster/configs/groovy/` would be more future proof. perhaps `/cluster/configs/groovy/staticConfig` would be better. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
