kishoreg commented on PR #13837: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13837#issuecomment-2323414672
Great addition. I had a few high level question - is relying on the naming convention of the segment new or existing requirement. I am guessing it's existing. Is it possible to get rid of this requirement and make it part of the segment metadata? We can do this as part of a separate PR. - can this be extended to having a batch(Offline) only upsert table? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
