shounakmk219 commented on code in PR #13771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13771#discussion_r1724451147


##########
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/QueryQuotaClusterIntegrationTest.java:
##########
@@ -169,14 +193,60 @@ private void runQueries(double qps, boolean shouldFail)
     assertTrue((failCount == 0 && !shouldFail) || (failCount != 0 && 
shouldFail));
   }
 
+  private void verifyQuotaUpdate(long quotaQps) {
+    String query = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + getTableName();
+    if (quotaQps == 0) {
+      TestUtils.waitForCondition(aVoid -> 
!executeQueryOnBroker(query).getExceptions().elements().hasNext()

Review Comment:
   > looks like the two stmts are same. is this intended to run the query twice 
back to back?
   
   Yes, basically making sure consecutive queries pass which indicated quota is 
not applied.
   
   > perhaps we can add a broker restful API to get runtime quotas for a table, 
which can help simplify the test here and can be helpful for debugging in prod 
as well.
   
   That's a good idea, will use this approach.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to