yashmayya commented on code in PR #13711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13711#discussion_r1719624105


##########
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/function/scalar/comparison/PolymorphicComparisonScalarFunction.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pinot.common.function.scalar.comparison;
+
+import javax.annotation.Nullable;
+import org.apache.calcite.sql.type.ReturnTypes;
+import org.apache.calcite.sql.type.SameOperandTypeChecker;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.function.FunctionInfo;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.function.PinotScalarFunction;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.function.sql.PinotSqlFunction;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.utils.DataSchema;
+
+
+/**
+ * Base class for polymorphic comparison scalar functions
+ */
+public abstract class PolymorphicComparisonScalarFunction implements 
PinotScalarFunction {
+
+  protected static final double DOUBLE_COMPARISON_TOLERANCE = 1e-7d;
+
+  @Nullable
+  @Override
+  public PinotSqlFunction toPinotSqlFunction() {
+    return new PinotSqlFunction(getName(), ReturnTypes.BOOLEAN_FORCE_NULLABLE, 
new SameOperandTypeChecker(2));

Review Comment:
   Ah, you're right, this actually isn't about nullability. Even a query like 
`SELECT greater_than(2, 1) FROM mytable` fails with the error: `No match found 
for function signature greater_than(<NUMERIC>, <NUMERIC>)` if we remove this 
overridden method because we wouldn't be registering the scalar function in the 
operator table anymore. And yeah, `SELECT null > 1 FROM mytable` works just 
fine.
   
   > If we want to keep the support of explicit greater_than, we can add it 
under PinotOperatorTable.STANDARD_OPERATORS_WITH_ALIASES. But I doubt if anyone 
is using it this way.
   
   Makes sense, I don't see any harm in retaining support for this explicit 
syntax, so I've added aliases for all these comparison operators.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to