shounakmk219 commented on PR #13584: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13584#issuecomment-2268114649
@sajjad-moradi @mcvsubbu , the `pauseStatus` field makes sense. Do you think we need to maintain the set of different pause reasons active on a table as well? Context will be lost during the reason being overridden/not recorded based on how we define the priority of these reasons. - paused consumption should not be overridden by quota breach as in that case consumption will resume once quota gets honoured - quota breach can be overridden by paused consumption as anyways quota limit is checked every time before resuming consumption. Here the priority is well established so may not be a big concern. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
