Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #9333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9333#discussion_r966440470


##########
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/segment/index/readers/forward/NoOpMVForwardIndexReader.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pinot.segment.local.segment.index.readers.forward;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import org.apache.pinot.segment.spi.index.reader.ForwardIndexReader;
+import org.apache.pinot.segment.spi.index.reader.ForwardIndexReaderContext;
+import org.apache.pinot.spi.data.FieldSpec;
+
+
+/**
+ * No-op forward index reader meant to be used by multi-value columns with 
forward index disabled. This is meant to
+ * provide clean exception handling for operations which need to read forward 
index when forward index is disabled.
+ */
+public class NoOpMVForwardIndexReader implements 
ForwardIndexReader<ForwardIndexReaderContext> {

Review Comment:
   We should treat forward index the same as other type of indexes, instead of 
specializing it and always put a dummy reader for it. Let's say in the future I 
want to support GROUP BY with inverted index only, my branching will be `if 
(dataSource,getForwardIndex() == null) ...`, similar to when we choose to use 
the scan based filter when inverted index doesn't exist.
   Conceptually we are able to support all operations with inverted index only, 
so I don't want to specialize forward index just for the exception message.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to