apucher commented on a change in pull request #8314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8314#discussion_r841183636
##########
File path:
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/broker/AccessControlFactory.java
##########
@@ -29,10 +31,13 @@
public static final String ACCESS_CONTROL_CLASS_CONFIG = "class";
public abstract void init(PinotConfiguration confguration);
+ public abstract void init(ZkHelixPropertyStore<ZNRecord> propertyStore);
+
public abstract AccessControl create();
- public static AccessControlFactory loadFactory(PinotConfiguration
configuration) {
+ public static AccessControlFactory loadFactory(PinotConfiguration
configuration,
+ ZkHelixPropertyStore<ZNRecord> propertyStore) {
Review comment:
see comments above. I'd go as far as marking both init methods
non-abstract, and by default implement the new one to call the old one.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
