squakez commented on PR #4942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4942#issuecomment-1840393778

   An additional comment which may be useful in the future. Before reaching 
this state, I've worked on a few experiments. The result of them may return 
useful eventually.
   
   The first experiment was to let the operator assume the control of the 
managed fields of a Deployment: 
https://github.com/apache/camel-k/commit/1e4aaaaa5d6fde8aab49121ff666ef355b904279#diff-de2d026ce0dc415e68ee971f300e7320de019cc68c5171cf76425859587f1a85
 - this solution was discarded because it clearly overlap the external 
deployment procedure (ie, triggering a new deployment).
   
   The second one had the same problem (overlapping external deployment): 
https://github.com/squakez/camel-k/tree/feat/it_import_delete_deploy - in this 
case we were deleting the deployment, in order to let the operator create and 
manage one from scratch.
   
   Although they are aggressive approaches, they may be used eventually in a 
sort of "dry-run" operation to let the user decide if a given deployment can be 
substituted with a managed Integration (at the price of forcefully deleting the 
original deployment).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to