On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:24:43AM +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > To support the limit, surplus CPU is waisted. I don't think > it is a good design. In other words, if every class is satisfied > in terms of its CPU guarantee and some classes can consume more, > surplus CPU should be given to the classes. Therefore, I'm not > interested in supporting the limit currently.
Can't you define this limit as "soft" limit? That would address your concerns? -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
