Hi, > Thanks a lot Maeda. > I tried that and it worked ! > I gave 20% share to kernbench and it showed 22% in the output. Please > see the attachment. I plan to play more with it.
That's great. > Can you pls explain why limit is meaningless for the CPU resource > controller..? To support the limit, surplus CPU is waisted. I don't think it is a good design. In other words, if every class is satisfied in terms of its CPU guarantee and some classes can consume more, surplus CPU should be given to the classes. Therefore, I'm not interested in supporting the limit currently. In addition, technically, supporting limit is not easy on top of the current CPU controller's algorithm. It is another reason. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
