Thanks a lot Maeda. I tried that and it worked ! I gave 20% share to kernbench and it showed 22% in the output. Please see the attachment. I plan to play more with it. Can you pls explain why limit is meaningless for the CPU resource controller..?
Regards, Rajaram Suryanarayanan | Team Lead | ES7000 Linux Systems Group Unisys Global Services -India | 'Purva Premier', 135/1, Residency Road, | Bangalore - 560 025 | +91-80-51594560 Do your best. Leave the rest to Linux. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. -----Original Message----- From: MAEDA Naoaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:54 PM To: Suryanarayanan, Rajaram Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Help in using kernbench Hi again, > Thanks. So is it enough to run a while(1) process in the default class > to see a difference ? Yes. It's enough. > Also do you mean I am correct in my methods of configuring shares and > using the kernbench tool ? I think so. > Now I feel that I should have moved the pid of kernbench to C1 instead > of looking for the pids of "make -j 4" in "ps -ef" and moving them to > C1..am I right ? It is OK, but if I were you I would open another terminal/shell for running kernbench and write its pid to C1/members. > Also I am not able to set the limits. When I echo the limit and the > max_limit values to the shares files, it doesn't get changed.. I tried > to set the max_limit of the default class to 100 and limit of C1 to 30. It is intentional, because the limit is meaningless for the CPU resource controller. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki
kernbench-results3
Description: kernbench-results3
