-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
> Indeed you should use CJKutf8 instead of CJK. The reason is the
> following.
>
> Once upon a time, each script had its own encodings. This made it
> easy to use different fonts: each encoding would use its own font.
>
> With UTF-8 this is slightly more problematic. And let's face it: the
> Latin script of most Asian fonts just sucks (just look at Arphic). I
> didn't expect anything else, anyway.
>
> If there is no "fontenc" option, all glyphs would use the CJK font.
> To get nice Latin or Cyrillic glyphs, add [T1] or another font
> encoding as an option, and CJK will first use fonts from the selected
> font encoding.
>
> \usepackage{CJKutf8} without any options will always use the CJK
> font.
>
> See doc/CJKutf8.txt for more information.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Danai SAE-HAN
> 韓達耐
>
got it, thanks a lot again!
Best wishes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE+tEbexs2apGZoVgRAkCDAKD43tX2uQlcgOqgMZZPSFEh0GWNRACeLxWv
meovN3cqgQsqSo029ZrcxZc=
=qOfW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Cjk maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
