Sirraide wrote:
> we are implementing the proposed resolution, which is the second set of
> change in that issue. we should _not_ implement the "suggested resolution" as
> discussions are still ongoing (notably concerns of it being too restrictive).
Well, the suggested resolution, i.e. *accepting*
```c++
template<class... Ts>
struct VS {
template<class U>
friend class C<Ts>::Nested...; // now ill-formed
};
```
is what’s already implemented. The proposed resolution rejects this instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
