Sirraide wrote: > I would recommend creating an issue and see how ewg handles the new > information before reaping out a lot of code.
Hmm, I mean, it looks like they’ve already thought about the consequences though, or am I missing something here, because the case that we currently support and which this ends up disallowing is explicitly listed as disallowed in the core issue: > The proposed resolution above disallows a few examples from paper > [P2893R3](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p2893r3.html) > (Variadic friends), such as > ```c++ > template<class... Ts> > struct VS { > template<class U> > friend class C<Ts>::Nested...; // now ill-formed > }; > ``` > https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2024/08/16236.php Ah, that I don’t appear to have access to unfortunately. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
