Endilll wrote:

> I would recommend creating an issue and see how ewg handles the new 
> information before reaping out a lot of code.

Sure, we don't necessarily need to change our implementation as CWG continues 
to consider the issue, but we need to update the test and the status for 
bookkeeping purposes. That's only fair when we write tests against moving 
targets (open issues).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to