tahonermann requested changes to this revision.
tahonermann added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:494
++NumSkipped;
assert(!CurTokenLexer && CurPPLexer && "Lexing a macro, not a file?");
----------------
Perhaps it would make sense to assert `CurLexer` here as well.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:555
while (true) {
CurLexer->Lex(Tok);
----------------
I don't think this change is sufficient. If `CurLexer` is null, then the `else`
branch will be entered and an unconditional dereference occurs there as well.
It looks like more analysis is needed, but perhaps the correct fix is to add a
non-null assertion somewhere above.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158293/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158293
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
