aaron.ballman accepted this revision. aaron.ballman added a reviewer: libc++. aaron.ballman added a comment. This revision now requires review to proceed.
LGTM but I'm adding libc++ as a blocking reviewer because there are questions about how well this interacts with their `stddef.h` (especially the `nullptr_t` bits): https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libcxx/include/stddef.h ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/stddef.h:16 + defined(__need_wint_t) || \ + (defined(__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__) && __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ >= 1) ---------------- iana wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > C23 K.3.1.1p2: The functions, macros, and types declared or defined in K.3 > > and its subclauses are declared and defined by their respective headers if > > __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ is defined as a macro which expands to the integer > > constant 1 at the point in the source file where the appropriate header is > > first included. > > > > So I don't think this should be `>= 1`. Same below. (Though I notice we > > seem to do this in other places, so perhaps that's more of a general > > cleanup we should make?) > `>=1` is what stddef.h was already doing, so I'd vote do this later as > general cleanup. That sounds reasonable to me! ================ Comment at: clang/test/Headers/stddef.c:7 + +ptrdiff_t p0; // c99-error{{unknown}} c11-error{{unknown}} c23-error{{unknown}} +size_t s0; // c99-error{{unknown}} c11-error{{unknown}} c23-error{{unknown}} ---------------- iana wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > At least one of these `unknown` errors should be fully spelled out (the > > rest can then be assumed to be the same wording as the long-form). > Let me know how this looks, I can just fully expand all of them if you > prefer. I was going by stddefneeds.cpp as an example. This works fine -- I would have also been happy if only `ptrdiff_t` was fully spelled out and the rest used `unknown` (we can infer they're all the same diagnostic from that). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157757/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157757 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits