efriedma added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/Headers/stddef.c:20-23 +// rsize_t will only be defined if __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ is set to >= 1. +// It would be nice to test the default undefined behavior, but that emits +// a note coming from stddef.h "rsize_t, did you mean size_t?" that can't be +// `c99-note`d away. ---------------- iana wrote: > Does anyone know a trick to catch the note from stddef.h? I think the syntax is something like `expected-warning@stddef.h:10`? See rGfcc699ae , There's also a wildcard syntax; see rG05eedf1f. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157757/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157757 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
