brendandahl marked 4 inline comments as done.
brendandahl added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lld/test/wasm/custom-undefine.s:17
+ .type bar,@function
+bar:
+ .functype bar () -> ()
----------------
dschuff wrote:
> I don't fully understand how this test is different from custom-attr.s. Bar
> is still defined, so the only thing I can see that's different is that it's
> not called. Is it relying on the linker GCing bar so that it's not defined?
> is the result different when bar is really undefined?
Undefined is a bad name. I'll change to unreferenced or something. This tests
when the function isn't referenced a tombstone will be placed in the custom
section (e.g. the payload below has a FFFFFFFF).
================
Comment at: lld/test/wasm/merge-custom-attr-section.ll:47
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { "wasm-custom"="custom0" }
----------------
sbc100 wrote:
> Is there some reason we can't use assembly for this test?
Nope, I rewrote the other two, but missed this one. I'll fix.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150803/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150803
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
