sbc100 added a comment. In D150803#4419370 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150803#4419370>, @sunfish wrote:
> Would it make sense to call this "jspi" in practice, rather than "async"? > Even though this isn't clang's decision per se anymore, it seems like the > reasoning earlier in this review would still apply. Did you mean to comment on the old PR? This new PR doesn't propose either "jspi" or "async", but adds that ability to define custom attributes.. since that was deemed more flexible and forward thinking. The decision as to which name emscripten will use for what can then be part of different discussion/PR we hope. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150803/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150803 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
