alexfh added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/ArgumentCommentCheck.cpp:124
@@ +123,3 @@
+ InDecl = InDecl.trim('_');
+ return InComment.compare_lower(InDecl) == 0;
+}
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> alexfh wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > Correct, which means this won't behave properly in some locales with
> > > UTF-8 identifiers. Consider Turkish, where İ (U+0130 “Latin Capital
> > > Letter I With Dot Above”) is the uppercase form of ı (U+0131 “Latin Small
> > > Letter Dotless I”). If the comment contains one version while the
> > > identifier contains the other, the comparison will currently fail, while
> > > a locale-aware comparison would succeed. You run into similar things with
> > > SS vs ß in German as well, where the uppercase form is two characters
> > > while the lowercase is only a single character.
> > Interesting, though it looks like there's now an official capital ẞ
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_%E1%BA%9E (which is not frequently
> > needed anyway, I guess).
> >
> > At the end of the day, what we get is that the non-strict mode is currently
> > somewhat stricter for non-ascii characters. Similar will happen with all
> > other parts in LLVM that rely on `StringRef::compare_lower`. I don't think
> > we need a separate test for this _here_, since it's a problem on a
> > completely different level. And I guess the use non-ascii identifiers in
> > C++ will cause much more serious problems than a slightly stricter
> > clang-tidy warning ;]
> We may just have different testing philosophies -- I would advocate for a
> test because we know of a use case that's broken with this particular use of
> `compare_lower`. Not all uses of `compare_lower` are problematic, after all.
> However, I'm not going to fight for that test case too hard because this is
> hopefully an edge case that is low-impact. A FIXME would also suffice.
I'm reluctant to add a case, since the cost of making it work and maintaining
on both linux and windows is higher than the value of it, IMO (it's my take out
from writing clang-format's limited support for Unicode).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23135
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
