aaron.ballman added a comment. In D125919#3556405 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919#3556405>, @delcypher wrote:
> @aaron.ballman > >>> Sorry if these are silly questions and if I've misunderstood something, I >>> saw n1863 say "functions return unqualified types" and I was very surprised. >> >> These are not at all silly questions, so thank you for asking them! > > Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. Your answers make sense to > me apart from the `derived-declarator-type-list`. I'm not sure what that is, > the copy of the standard I found doesn't seem seem to define what it is. I > see other people have complained about this in the past > (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13779273/in-the-standard-what-is-derived-declarator-type) > so I'll guess I'll stare at that for a while until it makes sense. :-D It took me a while to find the answer when I was looking at that yesterday, but it's defined in C2x 6.2.5p26 (without the `-list` part, that's added because there could be multiple declarators for the same T, as in `const int f(void), g(int);`). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
